Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Wednesday, 15th October 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Edinburgh Evening News site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Drinking and driving: 'There is no room for complacency'



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 15 May 2008
IT may have taken a considerable period of time to get the message through but it appears at last that the number of drivers who believe that getting behind the wheel while under the influence of alcohol is socially acceptable is dwindling.
Figures showing that the numbers who have failed breath tests in Edinburgh in the last ten years have nearly halved should be welcomed by all.

The breathalyser was introduced in the UK 40 years ago with the aim of curbing the increasing number o
f accidents in which alcohol was a factor. In an age when few questions were asked about drinking and driving, the Royal Society for the Prevention of Accidents estimates 13,000 people a year were injured or killed in road accidents involving drink before breath testing began in 1967.

Although the breathalyser cannot be given sole credit for totally changing social habits, it has been instrumental in driving these figures down to a point where, despite a sharp increase in the number of vehicles on the roads, only 2500 accidents were drink related in 2006. But drink-driving still accounts for around 40 deaths and 170 serious injuries on the roads annually in Scotland and, despite high-profile campaigns run annually over Christmas, the numbers caught during the festive period remains fairly constant.

Despite such publicity many drivers are still prepared to take a risk, thinking they will get away with it. The bulk of these are male and over 25 years of age. Eighty-four per cent of all those caught fall into this category.

It is to be hoped that the practice of automatically breathalysing any driver committing any offence, which came into force last December, will see fewer prepared to take such risks and it is heartening to see many young drivers appear to be adopting a more sensible approach.

The officer in charge of last year's festive blitz in the Lothians has already led calls for tougher penalties to dissuade serious and repeat offenders. Inspector Jill Kerr, from the force's road policing unit, said custodial sentences or lifetime driving bans could be among the measures considered.

RoSPA would like to see the limit reduced from 80mg to 50mg, claiming that those who fall between these two limits are two-and-a-half times more likely to be involved in a crash. It is not a suggestion without merit.

Although today's figures are encouraging, there is no room for complacency, and drink-driving remains a major problem, although it has been overtaken as a major safety issue by the use of mobile phones while driving. More than 300 were caught in a single day in Scotland driving while holding a mobile phone. Hopefully it will not take 40 years for the message to get through that this practice is equally dangerous and every bit as socially unacceptable as drink-driving.





The full article contains 487 words and appears in Edinburgh Evening News newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 15 May 2008 8:29 AM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Alcohol & binge drinking
 
1

Alternative (High Octane) Fuel Head,

Edinburgh 15/05/2008 13:22:07
There is no need whatsoever to reduce the drink drive limit. The one we have was established after years of meticulous research and is set at the level where the vast majority of people are largely unaffected.

Anyone who thinks the limit should be reduced needs to think again and get out of their heads the idea of blindly following other countries like sheep for no good reason. We have it right. Other countries have it wrong.

It is clear that our drink-drive laws work because despite a steady increase in the number of breath tests, the number tested positive has steadily fallen. Additionally, the number of crashes caused by drunk drivers has fallen also. Is this not what we are trying to achieve? In fact, nowadays, the number of crashes caused by drink-drivers is a tiny minority of the total form all causes.

Motoring and road safety groups should be happy that the number of people caught drink-driving has fallen. they should not be seeking ways to move the goal-posts. There is no room for complacency, but before they jump to the suppport of tightening the law up, they should think long and hard about what the REAL priority is. Is it to improve road safety or is it soley to catch and punish as many people as possible? The former does not necessarily follow from the latter.
2

NorT,

Edinburgh 15/05/2008 13:58:28
#1 Well said.As usual the motoring groups jumping on the bandwagon.
3

Smasher,

16/05/2008 15:21:42
The people who argue for a reduction are the sort who just won't stop. If they won the arguement and the 50mg was introduced. Do you think they'd stop? No chance. They'd then want 30mg, 20mg or even eating a wine gum could tip you over the limit. These sorts have empty lifes and will stop at nothing to make everybody elses life as sad as their own. LEAVE US ALONE. Bring back fox hunting, smoking and who cares if I wear a seatbelt in the back of my mates car. Where is it all going to stop?
4

Edin,

20/05/2008 13:08:02
You dont have a scuby doo !!! all of you above are clearly men. It should be that no alcohol should touch your lips if you have the car !! Full stop. So glad there is the smoking ban. Ha away and moan to your mammys cause that aint gonna change. hunting is fine though. Pah laugh if the face of u weridos... away and get a life eh.
5

RAV,

Canada 25/05/2008 02:14:15
Driving with a blood alcohol content of 0.08 & over is illegal in Canada, over 0.05 can result in a temporary suspension of driving priveliges (24 hrs, no fine). No argument from me but I do disagree with the magistrates who forgive those who need their lisence to work ie truckers. Are they NUTS! Likewise the inconsistency of sentencing esp those who are repeat offenders, some get fined & jailed, some get a fine but no jail, some get long suspentions, some get none!

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.