Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Classical review: Illuminati Wind Quartet

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 10 June 2009
ILLUMINATI WIND QUARTET **

RSAMD, GLASGOW
THREE world premieres of works by Scottish composers, commissioned and performed by a quartet of recent RSAMD graduates, promised dynamism and innovation. Yet even before the performance had begun, a certain disappointing similarity between the works
was apparent.

Each title and explanatory note proffered an overtly programmatic guide to the music which was later read aloud as if to emphasise the importance of the background stories. When the music was eventually forced to speak for itself, there was no disguising the unfortunate parallels between the three pieces.

True, Rory Boyle's A Box of Chatter was filled with light-hearted musical jokes that had no place in Gareth Williams's openly simplistic How and Oliver Searle's more meaningfully nostalgic Snowbirds. Nevertheless, all three employed the same tired compositional formulae to produce a programme that was far more consistent and familiar than it ever should have been.

Sadly it was beyond the powers of the Illuminati Wind Quartet to enliven this bland yet essentially palatable music.

Fresh from a stint aboard a cruise ship, the group were eager to embrace the lunchtime recital's informality between the pieces, but they remained irreparably tense and introverted while actually performing, undoubtedly feeling the pressures of having to play outside their comfort zone.

In the end it was difficult to say whether the shortcomings of the musicians had negatively affected the music, or vice versa. Either way, more could have been made of such an opportunity and more should have been delivered.





Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 10 June 2009 9:04 AM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Classical reviews
 
1

Lougee,

Glasgow 10/06/2009 15:38:59
I find it mildly depressing when the critics at one of Scotland's national newspapers are not educated enough to disinguish one piece of music from the next.

This is a little like saying:

"I was shocked to hear the baroque instruments playing throughout the whole of the St. Matthew Passion. Surely there could be some room for a sousaphone, to add gravitas to the final 8 bars."

It was a wind quartet concert.

That is what wind quartets do. They play pretty much all the way each piece. As a quartet.

To set the record straight, the playing at this concert was absolutely superb. Everyone enjoyed it (as demonstrated by a good crowd and raucous applause), which was aided by the personalities of each player, who were as professional in their playing as they were in their approach to delivering and preparing 3 brand new pieces for their repertoire.

It was evident that they had collaborated throughout the process with the composers involved, which is something so sorely lacking in the UK new music scene today. Music must be created to be performed and listened to; otherwise it simply does not exist.

Hats off to them all and I wish them the best of luck in their future performances of this new music.
2

elh21,

Glasgow 10/06/2009 23:33:41
I'd like to know a lot more about the "experts" who write these reviews, especially when their previous work and reputation is unclear. What are there qualifications? What is their own professional performing/composing experience, if any? How many other wind quartets (for example) have they played, written, or even heard? Once their own musical credentials have been established, their opinion would doubtless matter much more. In the absence of such locus standi, one wonders whether they are really qualified to opine for a national newspaper at all.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.