Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


A triumph for elbow grease on mission to repair Hubble

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 15 May 2009
ASTRONAUTS pulled off the first in a series of anticipated triumphs for astronomy yesterday as they installed a new £80 million camera aboard the Hubble Space Telescope.
In a day-long excursion fraught with danger, Drew Feustel, 43, and John Grunsfeld, 50, performed a precarious space ballet 350 miles up to remove Hubble's old Wide Field Planetary Camera and slot in a replacement.

As they orbited Earth outside the
space shuttle Atlantis, the Sun rose and set in the background every 90 minutes. "Who turned out the light?" Mr Feustel joked at one point.

The task was among several on a "to-do" list covering five spacewalks. Successful installation of the camera will provide astronomers with a new eye on the universe, allowing them to peer further, and with greater precision, into space.

The camera leaves Hubble "ready to unlock the secrets of the universe," said astronaut Mike Massimino, 46, who helped choreograph the spacewalk from inside Atlantis. From outside, Mr Grunsfeld corrected him excitedly. "More of the secrets," he said.

The spacewalk combined moments of light-hearted exuberance with nailbiting tension as the astronauts worked through their tasks, with Mr Feustel at times perched at the end of a 50ft boom operated from inside Atlantis by Megan McArthur.

"Too cool," he said as he emerged from the shuttle's airlock to see the planet spread out below him.

The mood was soon more muted as, for more than 45 minutes, Mr Feustel wrestled to unlock a bolt on the camera's housing, which has not been touched since its installation in 1993.

After the bolt resisted subtle attempts to free it using power tools, the astronaut was granted permission from mission control to use brute strength as the potential consequences of failure sent jitters through Nasa.

"I want you to understand that if this breaks, Wide Field stays in," Mr Feustel warned, raising the prospect that the camera's $126m replacement would be brought back to Earth unused.

A dose of elbow grease later, the bolt was freed, allowing the two men to slide the piano-sized instrument from its berth and insert its successor. The old camera has taken 135,000 of Hubble's most iconic images, but has degraded over the years and has been gradually edging towards breakdown.

Hubble, which is owned by Nasa and the European Space Agency, has transformed astronomy, providing unprecedented views of the universe, including images of remote galaxies forming not long after the Big Bang 13.7 billion years ago.

The mission to fix it – which, if successful, will extend its life to at least 2014 – coincides with the International Year of Astronomy, marking the 400th anniversary of the first telescopic observations of space by Galileo Galilei.





Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 14 May 2009 9:54 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Space science
 
1

Yok Finney,

Ross-shire 15/05/2009 09:07:30
"We have to learn again that science without contact with experiments is an enterprise which is likely to go completely astray into imaginary conjecture." - Evolution of the Solar System, NASA 1976, H. Alfvén & G, Arrhenius.

The result is now a "Big Picture" that emphasizes our dramatic prehistory and essential connectedness to the universe. No longer do we have to look at ourselves and the universe through the distorting sideshow mirrors of modern science.

The implications of electrical activity between planets will be profoundly disturbing for those who have built their cosmology around the weak force of gravity, acting in an electrically sterile universe. This strange, dogmatic oversight guarantees that nothing will remain in future of the fanciful Big Bang theory or the simplistic story of the formation of the solar system.
2

For Scotlands Future,

Vote for the SNP 15/05/2009 10:37:37
#1
I see you are a student of Immanuel Velikovski (or you should be: World in Collision and Earth in Upheaval). I think he was the first to propose electrical activity between the planets 50 or more years ago.

I don't hold with ALL of his conclusions, but he certainly was one of the most extensive and expansive gatherers of information for his studies. Certainly, he was vilified because he did not follow the route of "establishment" science - that of evolution and gradual change.
3

Yok Finney,

Ross-shire 15/05/2009 12:40:33
Velikovski had to work with the data of his time, so not all his suggestions fit. Yet the Hubble telescope and space probes are always confirming predictions from the Electric Universe (plasma physics) concept.

Quite where it leaves us, is hard to say: the militarisation of Scotland was perhaps only a small step backwards to the militarisation of Space. When considering, that higher intelligence must exist, is the wrong way forward.

Will Scots emerge as key players on the peripheral?
4

Arminius is both James donald and vehm Gericht,

China, 15/05/2009 13:30:21
What this boils down to is more wasting of money and yet more theory.
For instance, when they round off as to when the so called Big Bang happened to a precise 13 billion 700 million years, that is laughable at best but more likely a criminal waste of of money.
Whether we call it gravity or whatever else, it is still an irrefutable occurence, I witness it at work thousands of times a day personally affecting me, every time I walk, everytime I lift a foot, it comes down for the other one to be lifted, and that by any other name, is still a force that is present, no denying that one.
Everything else we read about like black holes or whatever else, is 100% theory, not one fact backing it up. Where we came from doesn't matter, it ain't gonna change a thing here and now, end of story.

POSTMARK 55

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.