Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Saturday, 6th September 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Burning issue: Should China face an Olympic boycott over Darfur crisis?



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

YES
Nobel Peace laureates, led by Archbishop Desmond Tutu
AS THE primary economic, military and political partner of the government of Sudan, and as a permanent member of the United Nations Security Council, China has both the opportunity and the responsibility to contribute to a just peace in Darfur. Ongoi
ng failure to rise to this responsibility amounts, in our view, to support for a government that continues to carry out atrocities against its own people. As host of the 2008 Olympic Games, China has a special role to play in ensuring that its actions this year are commensurate with the Olympic ideals of peace and international co-operation.

The atrocities in Darfur continue to intensify. Of the seven million inhabitants of Darfur, hundreds of thousands have already died due to the conflict and 2.5 million have been displaced. Rape and sexual violence have been and continue to be used as weapons of war against untold numbers of girls and women. The government of Sudan has also been involved in the forced relocation of people from refugee and internally displaced people's camps. Without homes to return to those displaced are left vulnerable to further attack.

We recognise some efforts by China in 2007 to increase diplomatic pressure on Sudan – notably through its support of the passage of UN Security Council Resolution 1769, calling for the deployment of a UN-AU hybrid peacekeeping force to Darfur. At the same time, however, we note with dismay that the Chinese government worked to weaken the resolution before it passed. China also doubled its trade with Sudan in 2007, providing resources that make it easier for Sudan to carry out atrocities.

NO
Chinese government


AS THE Darfur issue is neither an internal issue of China, nor is it caused by China, it is completely unreasonable, irresponsible and unfair for certain organisations and individuals to link the two as one.

Efforts to link the two contravenes the universally recognized principle of non-politicisation of sports, and runs counter to the Olympic spirit.

We sincerely hope that relevant parties respect facts, and make a fair and objective judgment on the positive role played by China on the Darfur issue.

Why can't the international community give a little more time, a little more chance and a little more patience to resolve the issue?

In the current situation, too much pressure or expanding sanctions will not be helpful for the peaceful settlement of the issue, but further complicate the situation.

China always tries to promote peace, and in order to fulfil the role China has offered 80 million yuan (£5.29 million) in humanitarian aid to Darfur and will send a 275-member engineering unit to participate in the implementation of the second phase of a UN support plan.

We have appointed a special representative on the Darfur issue, reflecting the Chinese government's commitment to further consult, communicate and co-ordinate with the concerned parties for a resolution to the issue.

We have conveyed the concerns of the international community to the Sudanese leaders on many occasions and suggest the Sudanese government show more flexibility and strength to accelerate the peace process.





The full article contains 535 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 13 February 2008 9:04 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Sudan
 
1

EWB,

UK 14/02/2008 07:23:54
First-out-of-the-blocks Tessa Jowell states that it would be "counterproductive" for Britain to boycott the Beijing Olympic Games as a protest about China's failure to put pressure on Sudan over Dafur.

Of course it would be counterproductive. The Government wouldn't want the Chinese to boycott our showcase Olympics in 2012 in retaliation, would it? Especially not when we'll have spent over £10bn and rising on this Ten-Day-Wonder/extravaganza.

Whatever happened to the whiter-than-white Government of the "ethical foreign policy" or did that principle die with Robin Cook?
2

Mikey,

14/02/2008 13:02:28
The MWPs wouldn't allow it and our athletes, now living on money grnated to them, would never allow their source of funding to stop!

Ethics? We're talking about Westminster here! If ever there was a home for shysters and sycophants, this is it!
3

Neil,

Glasgow 14/02/2008 13:36:48
This was also the question of the day on Radio Scotland this morning. Our media being impartial & honest & the BBC offically certified as such I must have missed the numerous ocasions when they asked if everybody else should refuse to go to the London Olympics because of our massacres & genocide in kosovo - something for which we are obvioulsy more directly to balme & indeed for which the evidence, though censored, is far stronger.

I don't think anybody can honestly claim to have evidence that a Chinese leader has been as guilty of genocide, child rape & other human rights abuses as our own dear war criminals.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.