Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Tuesday, 7th October 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Rights activists hail Spielberg China snub



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 14 February 2008
HUMAN rights groups yesterday welcomed Steven Spielberg's decision to withdraw from his role in this summer's Olympic Games in Beijing.
The film director stepped down as artistic adviser over China's lack of progress in resolving the humanitarian crisis in Darfur, saying his conscience would "not allow me to continue with business as usual".

China has given staunch economic and di
plomatic support to the Sudanese government in recent years.

More than 200,000 people are thought to have been killed and a further 2.5 million forced from their homes in the five-year conflict between Sudan's Arab-dominated government and Darfur's ethnic African rebels.

The organisation Human Rights Watch welcomed Spielberg's decision, and said it should inspire others to press China into action.

"Olympic corporate sponsors are putting their reputations at risk unless they work to convince the Chinese government to uphold the human rights pledges it made to bring the Games to Beijing," said Minky Worden, media director at Human Rights Watch.

The Aegis Trust, which campaigns to prevent genocide around the world, said China's own experience of massacre at Nanking 70 years ago should move them to act on Darfur.

Dr James Smith, the trust's chief executive, added: "No-one's calling for a boycott of the Games; it would be great to see them go ahead as a real celebration of China's remarkable development in recent years. But politics will continue to intrude on other spheres unless China grasps the nettle and leans on Khartoum."

Sudanese rebels also praised Spielberg's decision.

Abdel-Wahid al-Nur, the leader of the Sudan Liberation Movement, said: "This is a noble move. He will certainly go down in history as someone who gave human lives precedence over fame and money."

But last night actress Uma Thurman said Spielberg's gesture does not go far enough and called for further protest against China's "appalling" human rights record in Tibet.

She said: "Although there is so much good in China and in the Chinese people, the human rights record of the Chinese government is appalling.

"I think Steven Spielberg could have written a longer list."

The Liberal Democrat foreign affairs spokesman Ed Davey said Spielberg was right to criticise China's record in Sudan, and called on the British government to do more.

Spielberg's decision could lead others involved in the Games to reconsider their roles.

In a statement released to trade magazine Variety, the Oscar-winning director said: "I find that my conscience will not allow me to continue with business as usual.

"At this point, my time and energy must be spent not on Olympic ceremonies but doing all I can to help bring an end to the unspeakable crimes in Darfur.

"Sudan's government bears the bulk of the responsibility for these ongoing crimes, but the international community, and particularly China, should be doing more. China's economic, military and diplomatic ties to the government of Sudan continue to provide it with the opportunity and obligation to press for change."

Andy Burnham, the Culture Secretary, said: "The power of the Olympic Games is that it does bring people together and it does allow issues of global concern – Darfur is certainly one of those – to be addressed."





The full article contains 537 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 13 February 2008 10:08 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Sudan
 
1

,

14/02/2008 01:23:41
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
2

jj veritas,

14/02/2008 07:22:15
Spielberg's action will count for nought in the end. It will be outweighed totally by all the diginitaries, freeloaders and politicians that who will attend this grand junket in the far east.

Gordon Brown, Sebastian Coe, Ken Livingstone - thousands will attend.....and not at their own expense.
3

overton,

Balmedie 14/02/2008 07:33:48
Are the humanitarian problems in Darfur caused by racism or religious differences?
I was sure that, unlike Steven Spielberg, all the involved parties were Muslim?
If this is the case surely it is upto countries like Iran, Pakistan and Saudi Arabia to get in there and create a proper workable solution for their people.
This gesture by the 'master' is surely wasted on China and perhaps could have been thought out a wee bit better so that the real responsible parties were involved or suitably embarrassed even.
4

larry li,

beijing 15/02/2008 00:25:34
I'm afraid Mr Spielberg's action could only gave Chinese people the impression that the Americans are afraid of China's rise and will grasp any opportunity to hurm Chinese people's feeling. Spielberg's action is clearly hypocrite. Why spielberg did not protest when USA kill thousands of Iraqian to secure its oil supply? It's confirmed that Sadam did not make atom-bombs and have not any relationship with 9.11.
5

larry li,

15/02/2008 02:13:11
I belieave that Spielberg is a typical american. Unlike the Americans, Chinese people are peaceful people. We never poke our nose into other people's business. You Americans belieave you are gods, we Chinese do not. We are busy mending our own business. We are busy prepare the Olympic Games, without time trying to guess whether you Americans happy or not. I wonder, why could not you Americans leave us alone? You are interested in Sudan's situation, alright. You Americans have heave weapons and huge sum of money, why don't you help them solve the problem?
6

Stephen fae Scotland,

Folsom & Edinburgh 15/02/2008 06:20:44
Hey Larry,
Is it any wonder that people don't believe your commie propaganda about the meek peace loving 'mind-their-own-business' China (your Posting No.5) when in the earlier breath (Posting No. 4) you assert that America is afraid of "China's rise".

What kind of rise are you talking about anyway? The tanks of the 'Peoples Army' rising over the Himalayas crossing into Tibet to subjugate a peaceable and unarmed people? Or perhaps its the rising tide of blood that previously drenched Tinamen Sq? Oh I know its the rising number of female child murders to preserve the acceptable single male child norm? Or the rise in GHGs from the one new coal fired power station you are building EVERY WEEK.

Of course I am being facetious - I know the rise you are talking about is is your economic prowess as you flood every market in the world with cheap shoddy rubbish.

7

Stephen fae Scotland,

Folsom & Edinburgh 15/02/2008 06:27:22
Oh and to Overton (No.3) The Darfur situation is not strife among muslims - the persecutors are muslim - the government of Sudan (a muslim fundamentalist thug junta)and their allies in the form of armed militias called the Janjuied. The victims are a mix of unarmed African animists and Christians - in other words 'infidels' as far as the armed muslims are concerned.
8

overton,

Balmedie 15/02/2008 07:41:00
7 Stephen fae Scotland:

You sure about that - I thought that the persecuted peoples were Muslims?

China needs the time to develop and will, I am sure, evolve into a state where all people are equal, represented and prosperous.

The hypocracy of some Western countries, including the UK is quite hard to bear.
9

larry li,

15/02/2008 08:54:32
Hi Stephen,
Thank you for your comment. I'd like try to answer your questtion.
The first for tibet, I'm not sure whether you have the least knowlege about tibet's relation with the central government. Long before USA even founded, tibet had become a part of China. And before reform of 1950's, tibet had a system of slave. I visited tibet for several times. I had seen the slave's skin made drums and skull made bawls. The reform gave tibetan freedom. By the way, when the PLA entered tibet, they had not a single tank. just a reminder.
For the second about Tiananmen Sq, the blood of Iraqi people is more like what you said 'tide of blood' compared with what happened in Tiananmen Sq.
The third,for so called female child murders, China has more than 1.3 billion people. If there is not family control, much more people will be there. For the problem of female child abortion, I'm afraid it's not a problem only happened in China, it happened widely in poorly country include India. And it's out of the law.
The forth, for workers died of coal accidents, China's worker death rate is comparable with the USA. Only since China's power is depended largely on coal, coal production is much more great than USA, the number of death is much more than USA. This government payed great attention on preventing mine accidents.
Actually, what I mentioned 'the rising of China' means the people become much rich, living becoming more comfortable, talking more freely, etc.
I wonder whether you visited China recently, if not, I hope you could come to China and see with your own eyes. I have some friends coming from foreign country. We could meet at any time, talk about anything. This could not been imaged in the past. I enjoy living in China in this time although I know that we have many problems to face.
The last, I had to tell you, I'm not a communist.I'm only a medical doctor. Welcome to China to watch the Olympic Games and to hear Chinese people talk our own story.
10

larry li,

15/02/2008 09:13:39
Oh, for Stephen's last comment. You said that Chinese flood every market in the world with cheap shoddy rubbish, right? I wonder why every market are willing to buy the so-called 'cheap shoddy rubbish'. Are you imply the people who buy Chinese goods are all rubbish keepers? I think you should apologize for what you said. ho ho.....
11

Fanling,

Hong Kong 14/04/2008 01:33:14
#4, 5, 9, 10 larry li, beijing

Larry, you are whistling in the wind trying to bring sane and sensible argument to people whose mindset is preset and immovable - and typically born of ignorance. (The 'cheap, shoddy rubbish' comment above is a classic recurring example.) But the detractors here, so far, are almost peaceable compared with the usual shrill, rent-a-mouth culprits who will be sleeping the booze away right now, ready to return for screaming duty tomorrow.

China has its problems to solve, for sure, but the economic progress and catch-up made in the past 30 years is spectacular. No credit is given for that by the shouters, because they only have a single blinkered viewpoint based mostly on second-hand information - and crucially, most of them have never been to China. Those of the righteous brigade that claim to have visited China are only airing their prejudices, because they judge the rest of the world (China included) through the wrong end of the telescope. They are ten a penny. I prefer to see the bigger picture and give credit - AND stick - where it is due.

By the way, my long-term partner's elder brother is, like you, a doctor - in the north-east of China. She is also called Li.
12

Fanling,

Hong Kong 14/04/2008 02:06:36
... and I forgot to say that Spielberg, comfortably sitting on his multi-millions, is a renowned self-publicist keen to be seen to being "right-on" with the aforementioned screamers, aka armchair warriors. Pathetic.
13

Mashimaro,

China 14/04/2008 04:59:41
It's not the human rights, it's the oil!

Ni ma ma she zhe chuang shu, ni ba ba you cao mei de wei dao!
14

Let's have the truth,

Queensland 15/04/2008 12:40:06
#6

"you flood every market in the world with cheap shoddy rubbish".

.....Your post is probably made on the cheap shoddy rubbish you believe comes out of China.

My friend, Britain is the new capital of cheap shoddy rubbish.


15

Let's have the truth,

Queensland 15/04/2008 13:07:00
The detractors of China from the UK still suffer from the idea that anyone coming from south of Dover is a w*g.

They have a big shock awaiting them.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.