Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Were seized tanks set for rebel Sudanese?

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 30 September 2008
A DUSTY little town in central Sudan which sits above more than a quarter of the giant African country's known oil reserves was probably the planned destination of 33 battle tanks aboard the Ukrainian cargo ship MV Faina, currently hijacked by Somali pirates.
Abyei lies along the 1,250- mile border area between northern and southern Sudan and its fate may yet destroy a 2005 peace agreement and trigger a renewal of the country's 21-year north-south civil war that took two million lives. The Somali pirates may have unwittingly uncovered an enterprise as dangerous, perhaps more dangerous, than their own.

United States and other international warships monitoring the Faina off the northern Somalia coast may be as concerned that the tanks do not reach Sudan as they are to prevent small arms aboard the vessel falling into the hands of myriad Islamic fighters around the Horn of Africa. The pirates are demanding a $20 million (£11 million) ransom to release the ship and its cargo.

A spokesman for the US Fifth Fleet in Bahrain last night said the Faina's shipment of 33 T-72 Russian-designed tanks and thousands of tonnes of small arms and ammunition had been intended for delivery in Sudan.

The Faina had been due to dock in the Kenyan port of Mombasa. But both the Khartoum-based Sudan Tribune newspaper and Andrew Mwangura, the programme co-ordinator of the Seafarers' Assistance Programme in Mombasa, who tracks pirate attacks, said the tanks and other weapons were to be delivered to the Juba-based South Sudan government. Kenya was only a meant to be a transit point.

Kenya has a long border with and ethnic links to South Sudan, but no border with the north.

While not in breach of international arms control rules, the delivery of the T-72 tanks – in addition to more than 70 delivered last year, according to Mr Mwangura – may endanger Sudan's own Comprehensive Peace Agreement.

China buys most of the 500,000 barrels of oil that Sudan produces each day and it is Sudan's largest supplier of arms. The oil deal with China is worth nearly £5 billion a year to President Omar Hassan al-Bashir's government. China has also richly rewarded Mr Bashir's armed forces with weaponry – an arsenal that makes the government of South Sudan keen to arm itself in response.

Abyei has been described by international security experts as "Sudan's Kashmir". In an incredibly complex country, scarred by wars and coups, perhaps no area is more volatile and carries more implications for Sudan's future.

"If the Abyei political crisis is addressed, there is a potential for peace in the entire country," said John Prendergast, a human rights activist on Sudan and a former senior adviser to the White House. "If mishandled, it dramatically increases the possibility that Sudan's current conflicts – from Darfur (in the west] to the south to the east – will explode over the coming few years into a national war with regional implications and historically devastating repercussions for its people."

In response to the seizure of the Faina, Admiral Viktor Mardusin, commander of Russia's Baltic fleet, ordered a Russian missile frigate to Somali waters for more than two months "in order to guarantee the safety of Russian ships". That suggests the tanks and weapons aboard the Ukrainian vessel are of Russian origin.

Ukraine's defence ministry said it was not participating in the arms trade and did not know where the cargo was bound.

The pirate syndicates – there at least five, each about 1,000 strong – operate out of the breakaway statelet of Puntland, far to the north of war-torn Somalia. It declared itself separate from Somalia ten years ago.

A war-torn buffer zone

UNDER British rule, Abyei was a borderland between Arab-dominated northern Sudan and black African-dominated southern Sudan. A peace deal in 2005 ended two decades of war and set up a devolved South Sudan government. An independence referendum is due in 2011. In a clear attempt to annexe Abyei and its oil riches, President al-Bashir sent in the army last May to take on the southern militia, the Sudan People's Liberation Army. Abyei town was largely razed and 60,000 people fled, of whom at least 50,000 are still living in temporary shacks.

The thwarted tank delivery suggests South Sudan fears more attacks by the Khartoum government, in which, confusingly, it is represented.

Both sides have agreed to let the international Permanent Court of Arbitration in The Hague resolve the Abyei dispute, but a ruling is unlikely before next year.




Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 29 September 2008 10:27 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Sudan
 
1

Filosofo,

Kirkcaldy 30/09/2008 10:32:44
eh?
2

Alternative (High-Octane) Fuel Head,

Edinburgh 30/09/2008 11:17:02
One of the best written and detailed articles this paper has produced in a long time and the first comment against it is "eh?".

That says a lot for the average intellect of the readership doesn't it?

OK Filosofo, to put it in Toytown language, the nasty pirates attacked a ship that could have been engaged in illegal arms trading. Got that now?
3

,

30/09/2008 13:44:59
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
4

ScotLJM,

Michigan 30/09/2008 15:29:03
BRING BACK THE Q-SHIPS!! Make these pirates wonder about the next innocent looking merchant ship they decide to capture.
5

Alternative (High-Octane) Fuel Head,

Edinburgh 30/09/2008 17:40:40
#3:

I'm no expert but here are a few suggestions.

1. They are operating in international waters where not even their own country has juristiction.
2. Their country does not have an effective government and is ruled by various warring factions.
3. Commercial shipping are sitting ducks and defenceless.
4. America wouldn't want to invade Somalia because the resultant war would probably be many times worse than Vietnam.

I can see this leading to NATO navies being tasked with patrolling the area eventually.
6

Dragonhead,

Dalian,China 01/10/2008 01:13:48
..Could it even remotely be that our beloved friends the Russians are stirring the pot? After all, should "their friends" the rebels overthrow the present administration.The Russians would control even more of the worlds energy resources.China would be deprived of oil.That would suit Russia. It would also put a stranglehold on western nations who might benefit from Sudan's oil!
After all why invade, when you can destroy western nations' oil based economies or cow them, using oil and gas as weapons?
7

Mashimaro,

01/10/2008 14:20:31
#6 THE RUSSIANS? you're one sick puppy d/head. According to the Kenyan government the tanks were for Kenya.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.